Prevalence of electrocardiographic alterations in athletes associated with cardiovascular risk parameters / Prevalencia de alteraciones electrocardiográficas en deportistas asociadas a parametros de riesgo cardiovascular

Sport induces cardiac adaptations that are manifested with specific electrocardiographic alterations. This study was carried out in view of the need to identify the relationship between these electrocardiographic alterations with cardiovascular and demographic variables and physical exercise performed. Methodology: a descriptive cross-sectional study in 370 individuals, 211 men and 159 women (36 ± 13 years) that were distributed in three groups: male athletes, female athletes, and non-athlete men and women. Results: 51.08% of the studied subjects presented electrographic alterations, more frequent in athletes. Demographic and cardiovascular variables and the time of physical exercise performed were significantly associated with certain electrocardiographic alterations; the risk of presenting any of the alterations in athletes could be estimated based on the variables set out. Conclusion: There are associations between specific electrocardiographic alterations and cardiovascular, demographic and type of exercise variables that could classify athletes according to cardiovascular risk profiles (AU)

El deporte induce adaptaciones cardiacasque se manifiestan con alteraciones electrocardiográficas.Este estudio se realizóante la necesidad de identificar la relación existente entre estas alteraciones electrocardiográficas con variablescardiovasculares, demográficas y tiempo de ejerciciofísico. Metodología: estudio descriptivotrasversal en 370 individuos, 211 hombres y 159 mujeres (36 ±13 años)que se distribuyeron en tres grupos, hombres deportistas, mujeresdeportistas, yhombres y mujeres no deportistas.Resultados:El 51,08% de los sujetos estudiados presentaron alteraciones electrográficas, siendo más frecuentes en deportistas.Determinadas alteraciones electrocardiográficasen deportistas; se asociaron significativamente a las variables planteadaspudiendo estimar el riesgo de presentar alguna de las alteraciones electrocardiográficas en función de estas variables. Conclusión:Existen asociaciones entrealteraciones electrocardiográficas y variables cardiovasculares, demográficas y tiempo de ejercicio realizado que podrían clasificar a los deportistas según perfiles de riesgo cardiovascular (AU)

Care and treatments related to intensive care unit-acquired muscle weakness: A cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Intensive care unit-acquired muscle weakness (ICUAW) has an incidence of 40-46%. Early mobilisation is known to be a protective factor. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to identify the incidence of ICUAW in Spain and to evaluate variables likely to contribute to the development of ICUAW. METHODS: A 4-month, prospective observational multicentre cohort study was conducted on patients receiving invasive mechanical ventilation for at least 48 h. Data were collected from ICU day 3 until ICU discharge. The primary outcome was presence of ICUAW (diagnosed using the Medical Research Council [MRC] scale). The secondary outcome was nurse-patient ratio, physiotherapist availability, analgesia, sedation and delirium management, glycaemic control, and daily level of mobility during the ICU stay as per the ICU Mobility Scale. A logistic regression model was constructed based exclusively on days 3-5 of the ICU stay. RESULTS: The data of 642 patients were analysed from 80 ICUs, accounting for 35% of all ICUs in Spain. The incidence of ICUAW was 58% (275 of 474 patients; 95% confidence interval [CI] [53-62]). The predictors for ICUAW were older age (odds ratio [OR] = 1.01; 95% CI [1.00-1.03]) and more days with renal replacement therapy (OR = 1.01; 95% CI [1.00-1.02]). The protective factors for ICUAW were male gender (OR = 0.58; 95% CI [0.38-0.89]), higher Barthel Index (showing prehospital functional independence) (OR = 0.97; 95% CI [0.95-0.99]), more days of being awake and cooperative (defined by a feasible MRC assessment) (OR = 0.98; 95% CI [0.97-0.99]), presence of delirium (OR = 0.98; 95% CI [0.97-0.99]), and more days with active mobilisation (ICU Mobility Scale ≥ 4) (OR = 0.98; 95% CI [0.97-0.99]). CONCLUSIONS: The risk factors for ICUAW were functional dependence before admission, female gender, older age, and more days on renal replacement therapy. The protective factors for ICUAW were feasibility of MRC assessment, the presence of delirium, and being actively mobilised during the first 5 days in the ICU.

Physical restraint in critical care units from the experience of doctors and nursing assistants: In search of an interdisciplinary interpretation. / La contención mecánica en unidades de cuidados críticos desde la experiencia de los médicos y técnicos en cuidados auxiliares de enfermería: buscando una lectura interdisciplinar.

OBJECTIVES: The study aim was to explore the experience of doctors and nursing assistants in the management of physical restraint (PR) in critical care units. METHOD: A multicentre phenomenological study that included 14 critical care units (CCU) in Madrid (Spain). The CCU were stratified according to their use of physical restraint: "frequently used" versus "seldom used". Three focus groups were formed: the first comprised nursing assistants from CCUs that frequently used physical restraint, the second comprised nursing assistants from CCUs that seldom used physical constraint, and the final group comprised doctors from both CCU subtypes. Sampling method: purposive. DATA ANALYSIS: thematic content analysis. Data saturation was achieved. RESULTS: Four principle themes emerged: 1) concept of safety and risk (patient safety versus the safety of the professional), 2) types of restraint, 3) professional responsibilities (prescription, recording, and professional roles) and 4) "zero restraint" paradigm. The conceptualisation regarding the use of physical contentions shows differences in some of the principal themes, depending on the type of CCU, in terms of policies, use and management of physical constraint (frequently used versus seldom used). CONCLUSIONS: The real reduction in the use of physical restraint in CCU must be based on one crucial point: acceptance of the complexity of the phenomenon. The use of physical restraint observed in the different CCU is influenced by individual, group and organisational factors. These factors will determine how doctors and nursing assistants interpret safety and risk, the centre of care (patient or professional-centred care), the concept of restraint, professional responsibilities and interventions, interactions of the team and the leadership.

Degree of implementation of preventive strategies for post-ICU syndrome: Multi-centre, observational study in Spain. / Grado de implementación de las estrategias preventivas del síndrome post-UCI: estudio observacional multicéntrico en España.

AIM: To evaluate the degree of implementation of protocols associated with the prevention of intensive-care-unit (ICU) acquired muscle weakness, and the presence of the physiotherapist in various ICU in Spain. METHOD: A descriptive, cross-sectional study performed in 86 adult ICU in Spain between March and June 2017. Neurosurgical and major burns ICU were excluded. A multiple-choice survey was used that included questions on protocols for glycaemia control, sedation, pain assessment, delirium prevention, delirium management and early mobilisation. The survey was completed using a user-protected application and password. The Student's t-test or Mann-Whitney U test and Pearson's correlation or Spearman's Rho test were used for the inferential analysis. RESULTS: Eighty-nine point five percent of the ICU had a glycaemia control protocol, with a predominating range of 110-140mg/dl. Seventy-four point four percent evaluated sedation levels, although only 36% had sedation protocols. Pain assessment was carried out on communicative patients in 73.7%, and on uncommunicative patients in only 47.5%. Only 37.2% performed daily screening to detect delirium and 31.4% of the ICU had delirium prevention protocols, 26.7% had delirium management protocols and 14% had protocols for early mobilisation. Thirty-four point nine percent requested cross consultation with the rehabilitation department. CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of the different protocols associated with the prevention of ICU-acquired muscle weakness was high in relation to glycaemia control protocols, sedation level and pain assessment in communicative patients, and was low for early mobilisation and delirium screening and prevention. Similarly, the physiotherapist was seldom present in the ICU.

[Therapeutic restraint management in Intensive Care Units: Phenomenological approach to nursing reality]. / Manejo de la inmovilización terapéutica en Unidades de Cuidados Críticos: aproximación fenomenológica a la realidad enfermera.

AIMS: To identify nursing experience on physical restraint management in Critical Care Units. To analyse similarities and differences in nursing experience on physical restraint management according to the clinical context that they are involved in. METHOD: A multicentre phenomenological study was carried out including 14 Critical Care Units in Madrid, classified according to physical restraint use: Common/systematic use, lacking/personalised use, and mixed use. Five focus groups (23 participants were selected following purposeful sampling) were convened, concluding in data saturation. Data analysis was focused on thematic content analysis following Colaizzi's method. FINDINGS: Six main themes: Physical restraint meaning in Critical Care Units, safety (self-retreat vital devices), contribution factors, feelings, alternatives, and pending issues. Although some themes are common to the 3 Critical Care Unit types, discourse differences are found as regards to indication, feelings, systematic use of pain and sedation measurement tools. CONCLUSIONS: In order to achieve real physical restraint reduction in Critical Care Units, it is necessary to have a deep understanding of restraints use in the specific clinical context. As self-retreat vital devices emerge as central concept, some interventions proposed in other settings could not be effective, requiring alternatives for critical care patients. Discourse variations laid out in the different Critical Care Unit types could highlight key items that determine the use and different attitudes towards physical restraint.

Advance directives in intensive care: Health professional competences.

OBJECTIVE: To identify knowledge, skills and attitudes among physicians and nurses of adults' intensive care units (ICUs), referred to advance directives or living wills. DESIGN: A cross-sectional descriptive study was carried out. SETTING: Nine hospitals in the Community of Madrid (Spain). PARTICIPANTS: Physicians and nurses of adults' intensive care. INTERVENTIONS: A qualitative Likert-type scale and multiple response survey were made. VARIABLES: Knowledge, skills and attitudes about the advance directives. A descriptive statistical analysis based on percentages was made, with application of the chi-squared test for comparisons, accepting p < 0.05 as representing statistical significance. RESULTS: A total of 331 surveys were collected (51%). It was seen that 90.3% did not know all the measures envisaged by the advance directives. In turn, 50.2% claimed that the living wills are not respected, and 82.8% believed advance directives to be a useful tool for health professionals in the decision making process. A total of 85.3% the physicians stated that they would respect a living will, in cases of emergencies, compared to 66.2% of the nursing staff (p = 0.007). Lastly, only 19.1% of the physicians and 2.3% of the nursing staff knew whether their patients had advance directives (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Although health professionals displayed poor knowledge of advance directives, they had a favorable attitude toward their usefulness. However, most did not know whether their patients had a living will, and some professionals even failed to respect such instructions despite knowledge of the existence of advance directives. Improvements in health professional education in this field are needed.

[Cuff pressure control at the intersinve care unit: influence of nursing professionals' training]. / El control del neumotaponamiento en cuidados intensivos: influencia de la formación de los profesionales de enfermería.

OBJETIVE: To analyze proper control of endotracheal cuff pressure in an intensive care unit. The specific objective is to verify whether training of nursing professionals improves monitoring endotracheal cuff pressure. BASIC PROCEDURES: the study type is descriptive, observational and retrospective. All patients were admitted to the Critical Unit II of the Clínico San Carlos Hospital between May 2010-November 2011, requiring either a tracheal tube or tracheal cannula. Studied variables were: number of in range measures, number of intubated patients, or with tracheal cannula and register. Four cuts were made on all admitted patients admitted during the study period in order to measure endotracheal cuff pressure. Two cuts were performed before the professional nurses training and the other two cuts after a specific training with respect to endotracheal cuff pressure and Zero pneumonia. RESULTS: There were 74 measurements. The first cut obtained 40.74% of measures in range. In the second cut 61.90% of measures were identified in range. In the third cut, it was found that 85.7% of measures were in range and in the fourth court, it was noted the 89.47% of measures were in range. CONCLUSIONS: Monitoring of the endotracheal cuff pressure was inadequate before specific training of professionals. Nursing professionals training facilitates the correct measurement of the endotracheal cuff pressure, which improves patient safety.

[High-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy in critical patients. Prospective study]. / La oxigenoterapia de alto flujo con cánula nasal en pacientes críticos. Estudio prospectivo.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the incidence of use of high-flow nasal cannula oxygen (HFNC) in intensive care and evaluate the procedure. BASIC PROCEDURES: descriptive prospective study. INCLUSION CRITERIA: all participants were patients admitted to the intensive care units of the hospital Clínico San Carlos November 2012 - January 2013 that required HFNC. VARIABLES: socio-demographic; indications, complications, objectives and flows of the therapy. Statistical analysis with average, standard deviation and percentages, with the statistical program SPSS ver18.0. RESULTS: 12 cases of which 58.3% were men, with a mean age 68.66 (± 12) and with NEMS 33.25 (±7). The incidence of HFNC was 0.95%. The indication of HFNC was: 75% moderate respiratory failure or need for oxygen supply greater than 40%, 58.3% hypoxemia without hypercapnia, the 41.7% withdrawal and/or employment with non-invasive mechanical ventilation, the 25% support post-extubation, the 16.7% exacerbations of heart failure, the 16.7% improve respiratory work and the 8.3% acute lung edema. The main complications of the HFNC were: mouth-breathing (8.3%), nasal injury (8.3%) and abundant secretions (8.3%). In the fulfilment of the objectives of the HFNC, there was a 91.7% improvement of oxygen therapy, and in 50% of the cases orotracheal intubation was averted. CONCLUSIONS: There is a low incidence of HFNC in the unit. The main indication is the moderate respiratory failure or the high need for oxygen supply. Almost all patients have improved with oxygen therapy, although it has not been possible to avoid intubation.

[Mechanical restraint: its use in intensive cares]. / Contención mecánica: su uso en cuidados intensivos.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the impact of the use of mechanical restraint (MR) or physical restraints in a Critical Care unit and to evaluate the procedure. BASIC PROCEDURES: A descriptive, prospective study. INCLUSION CRITERIA: patients who required MR from March to June 2010. VARIABLES: demographic, clinical presentation, indications, techniques and devices. A statistical analysis with mean, standard deviation and percentages using the program SPSS 14.0. RESULTS: A total of 85 cases were studied: 65.9% male, mean age 64.19 (±17.9), NEMS 29.3 (±8.2). Incidence of MR: 15.6%. Main indication for MR: Risk of serious disruption of treatment processes (80%). Decision nurse (94.1%). Urgent action: (85.9%). Registration procedure: 57.6%. Information to the family: 9.4%. Previous actions: verbal containment (100%), pharmacological (48.2%). CONCLUSIONS: There is a relevant incidence of MR. The principal reason is that of avoiding interruption of the therapeutic process. The nurse makes the initial decision. Necessary information/training of professionals for legal and ethical repercussions is needed.